<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>24/7 Investor</title>
    <link>http://www.247investor.com/</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2010</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-03-11T17:25:39-05:00</dc:date>
    

    <item>
      <title>China to the Rescue</title>
      <link>http://www.247investor.com/expert_investment_advice/archive/china_to_the_rescue/</link>
      <guid>http://www.247investor.com/expert_investment_advice/archive/china_to_the_rescue/#2463</guid>
      <description>For the past year, the fate of commercial real estate in the U.S. has been a popular talking point for economic bears. Something like $1.4 trillion in commercial real estate loans comes due in the next 3 years. 

Given that a good portion of these properties are underwater, and the fact that banks are still reluctant to lend, the concern that many of these loans won&#8217;t get refinancing seems valid. 

Already, we have seen companies simply walk away from properties that are losing money, turning the keys over to the banks that hold the mortgages. Maguire Properties (NYSE:MPG) has done it. And we&#8217;ve seen BlackRock (NYSE:BLK) and Tishman Speyer Properties abandon Manhattan&#8217;s Stuyvesant  Tower when the value fell from $5.4 billion to $2 billion. 

For shareholders, these moves make sense because it&#8217;s better than throwing good money after bad. For Maguire, it was a matter of life or death for the company. 

Still, it&#8217;s a concern because someone has to step up and buy the impaired real estate from the banks. Otherwise, bank balance sheets are saddled with even more toxic assets, capital bases fall, lending dries up and the whole financial crisis gets repeated again. 

Interestingly, it may be the Chinese who help the U.S. out of this commercial real estate problem.</description>
      <dc:subject>Expert Investment Advice</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-03-11T16:25:39-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Greece, China and Spain, Oh My!</title>
      <link>http://www.247investor.com/expert_investment_advice/archive/greece_china_and_spain_oh_my/</link>
      <guid>http://www.247investor.com/expert_investment_advice/archive/greece_china_and_spain_oh_my/#2462</guid>
      <description>There are several items of positive news on the wire today. Italy&#8217;s prime minister and former European Commissioner President Romano Prodi has declared that &amp;quot;[f]or Greece, the problem is completely over&amp;hellip;I don&#8217;t see any other case now in Europe. I don&#8217;t think there is any reason to think the euro system will collapse or will suffer greatly because of Greece.&amp;quot;

I know, you&#8217;re probably thinking &amp;quot;yeah, right.&amp;quot; And I admit, the contrarian in me is asking &amp;quot;what about Spain and Portugal?&amp;quot; 

There are clearly issues with the European Union, given the disparity in economic strength between countries like Germany and Greece or Spain. But we have similar disparities here in the U.S. 

I&#8217;m not ready to believe the debt problems in Europe are gone. But Prodi&#8217;s announcement will probably alleviate investors&#8217; concern somewhat. That, in turn, could help the euro make up some ground against the U.S. dollar.</description>
      <dc:subject>Expert Investment Advice</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-03-10T18:37:09-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Anniversary, Part II</title>
      <link>http://www.247investor.com/expert_investment_advice/archive/anniversary_part_ii/</link>
      <guid>http://www.247investor.com/expert_investment_advice/archive/anniversary_part_ii/#2461</guid>
      <description>I suppose it&#8217;s fitting that futures should be down on the morning of the one&#45;year anniversary of the stock market bottom last year. Perhaps stocks will put in a similar reversal today, but even if they don&#8217;t, I think we can take a little selling in stride. 

Oil prices are down a bit today as the dollar strengthens. We should note that the dollar and oil have moved higher in tandem lately, proving that there is more to the strength in oil prices than its relationship to the U.S. dollar. 

Expectations for the global economic recovery and a subsequent rise in demand for oil are part of it. But I also think that investors are slowly realizing that there is very little upside for production levels in non&#45;OPEC countries. 

A recent article about Mexico bears this out. If you don&#8217;t know, one of the world&#8217;s biggest oil fields, Mexico&#8217;s Cantarell, used to produce 2 million barrels of oil day just a few years ago. Now, it doesn&#8217;t even give up 500,000 barrels a day. 

In January, Mexico posted a 2.65% drop in year&#45;over&#45;year oil production. And January&#8217;s production total was the highest in 9 months.</description>
      <dc:subject>Expert Investment Advice</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-03-09T16:38:42-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>New Highs for S&amp;P 500</title>
      <link>http://www.247investor.com/expert_investment_advice/archive/new_highs_for_sp_500/</link>
      <guid>http://www.247investor.com/expert_investment_advice/archive/new_highs_for_sp_500/#2460</guid>
      <description>It&amp;rsquo;s hard to believe that just a year ago, the Dow Industrials were trading around 6,500. It&amp;rsquo;s easy to look back and see this as an obvious buying opportunity, but it sure didn&amp;rsquo;t feel that way at the time. 

Of course, I was recommending stocks in SmallCapInvestor PRO, because valuations were incredibly low. But I was mitigating the risk by taking profits quickly. 

For instance, we took profits on SXC Health Solutions (Nasdaq:SXCI) in April with a 19% gain. That stock has gone on to post some fantastic gains. Conversely, we made a quick 33% on Arena Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq:ARNA) between March 3 and March 11, 2009. That stock is now much lower than our exit price&#8230;</description>
      <dc:subject>Expert Investment Advice</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-03-08T17:39:55-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Well Played</title>
      <link>http://www.247investor.com/expert_investment_advice/archive/well_played/</link>
      <guid>http://www.247investor.com/expert_investment_advice/archive/well_played/#2459</guid>
      <description>This morning&#8217;s payroll data came in better than expected. After economists warned that February snowstorms may have depressed payrolls by as much as 100,000, the 36,000 job losses reported for last month sounds like good news. Well played, sirs, well played. 

Now bullish economists are pressing their advantage with statements like this: &amp;quot;We&#8217;ve got positive jobs growth in there, we just can&#8217;t see it&amp;quot;. 

Ok, I&#8217;ll admit, I&#8217;m having a little fun with the economists on this. It&#8217;s good news that the unemployment rate is holding at 9.7%. And the fact that economists are close to unanimous in expecting jobs growth this year is also a positive. 

*****For some anecdotal evidence of job growth, Bloomberg reports that technology services company Accenture is adding 50,000 workers. Of course, just 9,000 will be hired in the U.S. And the hiring will &amp;quot;spree&amp;quot; will run through August. But still, a year ago, I think we&#8217;d all have been happy to know that companies would actually hire people again. 

Bloomberg also reports that the service industry hired 24,000 in February and 27,000 in January. 1,000 factory workers were hired in February after 20,000 in January. The biggest areas of weakness remain construction and financial, which lost another 64,000 and 10,000. 

Of course, the construction and financial sectors probably added the most workers during the housing bubble, so it&#8217;s not a surprise that these two sectors are still adapting.</description>
      <dc:subject>Expert Investment Advice</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-03-05T18:56:46-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Huge Gains From Smart Cards</title>
      <link>http://www.247investor.com/expert_investment_advice/archive/huge_gains_from_smart_cards/</link>
      <guid>http://www.247investor.com/expert_investment_advice/archive/huge_gains_from_smart_cards/#2458</guid>
      <description>This must be a first. Citigroup (NYSE:C) CEO Vikram Pandit abandoned the attitude of entitlement that has characterized so many bailed out banks and simply said &amp;quot;Citi owes a debt of gratitude to American taxpayers&amp;hellip;We look forward to helping them realize value on that investment.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;

Let&#8217;s not forget, too, that it was Pandit who volunteered to work for a $1 salary while Citi dug itself out of the hole. Meanwhile, other bank CEOs were fighting to keep their multi&#45;million dollar compensation packages coming. 

It seems like Pandit is the only one who realizes he&#8217;d be out of a job were it not for government bailouts. 

*****Of course, it should be noted that several banks didn&#8217;t want to accept TARP money. They felt they would be fine and didn&#8217;t want to be restricted by TARP requirements. (That means they didn&#8217;t want to have to curb compensation.)

Personally, I don&#8217;t believe all these banks were fine, especially Bank of America (NYSE:BAC). If BAC was fine, why has it chosen to sell stock and warrants to pay TARP money back? Shouldn&#8217;t that TARP cash just be sitting in an account somewhere?</description>
      <dc:subject>Expert Investment Advice</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-03-04T17:53:31-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Chicken or Egg?</title>
      <link>http://www.247investor.com/expert_investment_advice/archive/chicken_or_egg/</link>
      <guid>http://www.247investor.com/expert_investment_advice/archive/chicken_or_egg/#2457</guid>
      <description>Payroll processing firm ADP reports that private employers cut jobs by 20,000 in February. That reading is in line with expectations. It also is more evidence that the rate of job losses is slowing, or stabilizing. 

That&#8217;s an important first step for getting actual job growth and putting the economy on a clear path to recovery. But there&#8217;s a long way to go before fewer job cuts turns into actual net hiring. 

Housing appears to be in &amp;quot;chicken and the egg&amp;quot; territory. Will an improved housing market help employment, or must employment first improve before housing can recover? 

Given that much of the housing supply on the market is foreclosed homes, it would seem that affordability is a big issue. Not that prices aren&#8217;t cheap, but if you don&#8217;t have a job, you can&#8217;t buy a house. The only thing that will speed up the rate at which existing housing inventory is worked off is employment. So maybe the housing recovery is the egg.</description>
      <dc:subject>Expert Investment Advice</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-03-03T17:23:14-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>More Upside for March</title>
      <link>http://www.247investor.com/expert_investment_advice/archive/more_upside_for_march/</link>
      <guid>http://www.247investor.com/expert_investment_advice/archive/more_upside_for_march/#2456</guid>
      <description>In early February, stocks  looked as though they were breaking down. We had just gotten through the Dubai  debt problem. China was raising reserve requirements for banks to slow the rate  of lending. And then the news about Greece&#8217;s debt problems broke. &amp;nbsp;

The S&amp;amp;P 500 had dropped from  January highs at 1,150 to as low as 1,044. That&#8217;s a 9% move, and if you recall  it was enough to get investors a little nervous. In fact, some were even saying  that the global economic rebound was done before it was even a year old. &amp;nbsp;

It was about that time that  I started including   TradeMaster Daily Stock Alerts&#8217; Jason Cimpl in our daily  conversation here at Daily Profit. Jason is the technical analyst and  trading strategist for TradeMaster Daily Stock Alert. In other  words, he studies buying and selling activity in the financial markets in order  to gain an early read on the market&#8217;s next move. He&#8217;s good at it, and his skill  has earned him a few hundred loyal members to his trading service. &amp;nbsp;

You may recall, Jason was  bullish in early February. He told us he expected the S&amp;amp;P 500 to move back to  1,085 and eventually move as high as 1,120, where it is today. And of course, he  made plenty of upside recommendations to his loyal readers. In fact, out of 13  trades initiated in February, TradeMaster Daily Stock Alert  readers made money on 9 of them. That&#8217;s a 70% win rate. Total gains were 47%. &amp;nbsp;

I will include commentary  from Jason on a regular basis here in Daily Profit. And so you know, he&#8217;s  expecting more upside. In his own words...</description>
      <dc:subject>Expert Investment Advice</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-03-02T18:10:26-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Soros Doubles Down</title>
      <link>http://www.247investor.com/expert_investment_advice/archive/soros_doubles_down/</link>
      <guid>http://www.247investor.com/expert_investment_advice/archive/soros_doubles_down/#2455</guid>
      <description>Somebody knows what do about  the U.S. dollar rally we&#8217;ve seen lately. &amp;nbsp;

A recent regulatory filing with  the SEC on February 16 shows that George Soros&#8217; Soros Fund Management has  doubled its holdings in the SPDR Gold Trust (NYSE:GLD). Soros is now  the 4th biggest investor in GLD. John Paulson&#8217;s hedge fund, Paulson &amp;amp;  Co. owns the most GLD, with 31.5 million shares. &amp;nbsp;

I discussed Soros gold  investment in a recent   Daily Profit. Soros believes gold is likely to become a &amp;quot;bubble asset.&amp;quot;  Low interest rates and concerns about the global economic recovery would be the  driving catalysts. But as we know, bubbles occur when buying begets buying. 

&amp;nbsp;Gold is currently trading  around $1,095 an ounce. Price estimates from Goldman Sachs and HSBC call for  gold prices to rise to the $1,235 to $1,300 range. But I think Soros&#8217; position  suggests he thinks it could rise even higher than that. &amp;nbsp;

And that&#8217;s the thing about  bubbles. Once they start, it&#8217;s hard to say how high prices can run. 

&amp;nbsp;Now, as you know, I&#8217;m usually  a fundamental investor. I like to buy reasonably valued companies that are  taking advantage of important economic or consumer related trends. At the same  time, I believe gold should be part of any portfolio, especially now.</description>
      <dc:subject>Expert Investment Advice</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-03-01T20:06:03-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>GDP Revised&#8230;Higher?</title>
      <link>http://www.247investor.com/expert_investment_advice/archive/gdp_revisedhigher/</link>
      <guid>http://www.247investor.com/expert_investment_advice/archive/gdp_revisedhigher/#2454</guid>
      <description>The first revision to fourth  quarter GDP is out this morning. And amazingly enough, it was revised higher,  from 5.7% to 5.9%. This is the first time I can recall a significant piece of  data being revised higher in the last year. &amp;nbsp;

Of course, we know that much of  the strength in the economy is a direct result of government stimulus policies.&amp;nbsp; Real growth may be running around 2%. But the bottom line is that the government  has, and will continue to, support the economy. That should keep us looking for  upside for stocks, even though the economy is basically treading water.

&amp;nbsp;*****Investors seem to think  it&#8217;s now a law that oil and other commodity prices will trade in tandem with the  U.S. dollar. In other words, because oil and other commodities are priced in  dollars, as the relative value of the dollar falls the price of oil and other  commodities will rise. &amp;nbsp;

The relationship makes sense.&amp;nbsp; And for much of last year, it was actually working. But times have changed&amp;hellip;&amp;nbsp;

To keep things simple, we&#8217;re  going to have a look at just two charts today &amp;ndash; the U.S. dollar index and the  light, sweet crude oil futures chart, the WTIC. As we&#8217;ll see, the relationship  between oil and the dollar changed in early December 2009. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <dc:subject>Expert Investment Advice</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-02-26T17:02:25-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>